🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for data to train their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free version of the service”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.